Talk:Continuous Liquid Interface Production
 | A fact from Continuous Liquid Interface Production appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 March 2015 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Continuous Liquid Interface Production. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
TED talk under external links section
[edit]Hi. I have inserted a link to TED talk under external links twice and it has been removed twice. Is there any reason why this link should not be included? I can see that it is now used as a reference and is mentioned in the text. Still I believe it should be listed under external links since IMO it is an informative video, good quality and from a trusted organization. I believe that more readers will be aware of the existing of the video if it is found under external links (lets be honest; it is the fewest readers that ever looks at the reference list... it is the only section that recieve less attention than... well external links) and IMO this is a good way to "integrate" more video into Wikipedia.
The video was linked as it is below:
Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 22:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia must continue to get science and technology wrong
[edit]Nearly every engineering undergraduate learns the difference between continuous and batch reactors at some point, so there are a very large number of people worldwide who understand exactly why this continuous reaction system would result in layerless 3D objects as opposed to the layered 3D objects created by the sequential batch operations of discontinuous 3D printers. Figure 1 of the Science article calls parts created by the process "layerless," and the developers of the process refer to the objects created as lacking layers in multiple references cited by the Wikipedia article. That is precisely why the lead to the article must claim that CLIP creates "successive layers of an object." Wikipedia must put scientists and engineers on notice that we are the only smart ones. Only we know the facts and the truth. Those moronic peer reviewers and editors at Science Magazine are rank amateurs who cannot be trusted. Keep up the good work. Flying Jazz (talk) 12:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the catch, but you're not as funny as you think... Lfstevens (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Diagram
[edit]Added stylized diagram and removed "mechanical diagram requested" tag. Egmason (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)