Talk:Constitutional Union Party (United States)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitutional Union Party (United States) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

I would just like to say that I find the word "Whiggery" very amusing, and the phrase "border-state Whiggery" even more so. --Jfruh 02:01, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Whiggish" is also amusing--JimWae 02:09, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)

Its one of those inherently funny words.--Kross ^Talk 06:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to thank all of the people who work for Wikipedia...this online encyclopedia really helps me with my homework...this article was really great because i needed something about the Constitutional Union Party...thank you again!!!...keep up the good work!!

Orange as CU's color?

Did the Constitutional Union Party really have orange as an official, or even unofficial, color? I find this somewhat dubious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.22.88.90 (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Centrism as Constitution Union Party's position

I would like the political position of "centrist" removed entirely from the. For one, the party consisted mostly of former Whigs, who were right of center. For two, the party was only active for a single election cycle, and really declined to take left, right, or centrists positions on anything. Thoughts? Purpleback pack 89≈≈≈≈ 15:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Secessionism vs Disunion

These are obviously two terms claimed to be for the same thing, I will note that. One is an accurate descriptor (those in favor of a certain state or regions secessionist agenda), and disunion (those in favor of the total breakup of the union). No American political figure I am aware of, advocated for a total breakup of the Union. They merely argued for breaks along sectional lines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.244.191 (talk) 04:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutional Union Party (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130526075818/http://constitutionalunionparty.com/ to http://www.constitutionalunionparty.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]