Talk:Consolidation bill

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bills

In what sense is the word "bill" used here? Is a consolidation bill a type of private bill? (Please pardon my ignorance of UK government.) — Ringbang 20:20, 12 August 2005 (UTC) No. Consolidation bills are public bills, generally promoted by the Government, often following the work of the Law Commissions. There are variations in procedure depending on whther it is "pure" consolidation (just bringing existing text together into a single document) or includes some amendment of the law to facilitate consolidation. They are sometimes preceded by a more substantive public bill which makes the changes to the law which allows the consolidation to proceed. For example the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 consolidated the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1975 which had been amended many times, and was preceded by the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1995.--George Burgess 14:11, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger

One, not necessarily insurmountable, obstacle to this merger is the fact that a consolidation Act is not a consolidation Bill, because an Act is not a Bill. James500 (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: a bill may or may not become an act, but they are sufficiently similar that I think that they can reasonably be discussed together. I'd recommend listing under Consolidation Acts as it is the act that is final product, whereas the bill is more transient/ephemeral. Having said that, it doesn't much matter which is chosen. Klbrain (talk) 15:01, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum to my last comment; I see that Consolidation Act had been redirected some time ago to Consolidation bill, so it seems reasonable that the same decision should be made for Consolidation Acts. Klbrain (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consolidation bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.queens.cam.ac.uk/Queens/Record/2003/Academic%20Record/BetterLaw.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060418073148/http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rewrite/index.htm to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rewrite/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]