Talk:Conquest of Jemtland

Military history: European / Nordic / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ethnicity

The article says:

"Horn learned that a secret alliance had been made between the people of Jämtland and the Norwegians, ratified with the local communities' seals."

So, less than one generation after Sweden's conquest of Jämtland, the people of Jämtland were no longer Norwegians? This sounds like original research to me. // JiPe (90.227.154.247 (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The whole thing really needs to be better sourced. The single source that they have is from a book one-hundred twety years old. There must be something better than that... Dinkytown (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]