Talk:Conostylis argentea
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conostylis argentea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Conostylis argentea be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Western Australia may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article refers to a taxon that doesn't have its type locality listed. If you can, please provide it. |
Conflicts in the descriptions
[edit]I possibly should not have started this article as it seems from the conflicts in the descriptions between FoA and FloraBase, that one or the other was transcribing a different species. I contacted Florabase two months ago to try to get an answer resolving the problem, but have had no reply. Nor has there been a change in either source.. MargaretRDonald (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- Wikipedia requested images of plants
- WikiProject Plants articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- C-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Australia
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Western Australia