Talk:ConnectU

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2007. The result of the discussion was redirect to Facebook.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Delete this article

This article should be deleted since the website ConnectU is not a known project. Its rating is very low and this website is only known because of its connection with Facebook. As we may see from the reference section that it only lists articles about lawsuits by ConnectU against Facebook and in my opinion that is not enough. The website must have a notability of its own and I think this is not the case with Con

Delete this article

There is no important information here that is not contained within the facebook article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.195.145.135 (talk) 16:28, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Don't delete this article

Wikipedia is about completeness and this article points out some important aspects of the case and its history in the legal system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.223.0.143 (talk) 19:27, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Just because the site is not popular does not mean it does not deserve an entry in Wikipedia. ConnectU may be much more well known because of the Facebook litigation, but that does not justify removing it from an encyclopedia. Okuzaone 16:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please everyone, contributions to an AfD discussion belong on the relevant AfD page, not here. -- Smjg 00:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just learned about ConnectU and was glad I could learn about the history of it here on Wikipedia. Please don't delete. 70.225.187.189 (talk)eric ferguson —Preceding undated comment added 03:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I think we should restore it..

IMO, it should be restored. The fact that it has gained popularity and came to be known by many people via facebook is no reason for it to be deleted. I will wait before restoring it, pending further input from other users. Cheers!

Λua∫Wi se ^{(Operibus anteire)} 11:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough history of ConnectU itself?

If the article is going to be retained, then I think there should be more concrete information about ConnectU itself. The particular detail that I was looking for was actually when it shut down, but now I'm wondering how large it grew and whether or not they managed to market the site to any other schools. In favor of deleting it, I have to say that right now I don't see any particularly significant or memorable things there, and on its lack of such merits, the argument for deletion is quite strong. The key information here might belong in a table about failed social networking sites, probably linked as supporting information from the main article on social networking. Shanen (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ConnectU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.connectu.com/about/short.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ConnectU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]