Talk:Congressional seed distribution

A fact from Congressional seed distribution appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the U.S. Department of Agriculture had members of Congress distribute millions of free seed packets to Americans?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Congressional seed distribution.

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Thing(s).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention
Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes
Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs
Other :
- Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess:
  - {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}}
  - {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}}

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that in the 19th and early 20th centuries the United States Department of Agriculture distributed millions of free seed packets through US Congressmen?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Twynham hut
Comment: Not sure that this is the best phrasing...

Created by Eddie891 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I agree, the hook should be rephrased. It's not clear what "through" means in this context (t · c) buidhe 07:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Buidhe: How about ALT 0b below? I can't think of a great way to briefly explain how it actually worked with Congresspeople, but that's not really the focus of my suggested hook right now anyway. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0b: ... that in the 19th and early 20th centuries the United States Department of Agriculture distributed millions of free seed packets to Americans?
ALT0c: ... that in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the United States Department of Agriculture had members of the United States Congress distribute millions of free seed packets to Americans?

Newly created article that is large enough and sourced to some articles, with plentiful inline citations. The article appears to be written neutrally and the hook fact is throughout the "Program" section. I'm adding "ALT0c" as another rewrite to try to make the hook fact more clear. QPQ is complete, but there are is a link (in the article twice) that needs disambiguation. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Muboshgu, I've resolved the {{dn}} tags. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay here. Good to go. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hi Yoninah. with regards to your edits on Congressional seed distribution, I just have some questions. Adding a fixed px to an image, while it definitely looks better on my computer, is explicitly disapproved of in WP:THUMBSIZE. I replaced it with |upright=1.4-- is that OK with you? While this edit was fine, the source in question is a USDA research paper, which should be in public domain, so I don't think putting it into quotes was necessary, and I attributed it with {{PD-notice}}-- did I miss something here? Cheers and happy new year, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: you are right on both counts. Sorry for interfering. Yoninah (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. I'd rather have you not be perfect once in a century than let the many obvious mistakes you fix slip through my work. Thanks for all you do. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]