Talk:Cone penetration test

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soil Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Cone penetration test is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

is it possible to have diferent result of CPT and lab test?? why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.95.90.47 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 7 June 2007

Because the CPT is measuring something different than lab tests do, and under different conditions. Correlations between CPT results and lab test results have been developed, but are only correlations, not identities. Αργυριου (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is very possible to get differening results from CPTs and lab tests. Firstly there may be errors in gatheing the results from either or both the CPT and the lab tests. Secondly it will depend on what you are comparing. If you are comparing a derived paramter and a lab test results, care must be taken that the derived parameter was calculated for the soils that it was orginally derived for.--BigDazza77 (talk) 00:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled (2)

Is it necessary to have the article based on one manufacturers equipment?842U (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, in fact I removed a bunch of advertising. Drillerguy (talk) 20:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]