Jump to content

Talk:Conditional disjunction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not very clear...

[edit]

A formula would be better, than the verbal description.

Searching for "conditional disjunction" in Google, I found the following statement:

Since the columns for P → Q and ∼ P ∨ Q are identical, the two statements are logically equivalent.
This tautology is called Conditional Disjunction. You can use this equivalence to replace a conditional by a disjunction.

This seems to be a different use of the same term, but where did you actually find it as one of the 256 ternary logical connectives?

Greetinges, Hexadecimal (talk) 12:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]