Jump to content

Talk:Conímbriga

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contradictions

[edit]

There are some contradictions in the text of this article, in one paragraph it says the Romans invaded in the "2nd Century A.D.", and another says they arrived in the "second half of the Ist century B.C." Anyone with knowledge on the topic have any insights? - AKeen 19:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, 2nd Century BC should be correct: The invasion of the iberian peninsula started with the celtiberian war which started 197 BC and ended around 179 BC. With the end of numantian war (154 BC - 133 BC) all of the iberian peninsula had been occupied by the romans. --84.167.214.160 12:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That article is really bad. Julius Caesar invaded in the first century BC, but I'm not sure he went that far north, though I'd really have to look it up. The Conii were a completely different culture in the far, far south (I went from Lagos, Conii territory, to Leiria, about an hour south of Coimbra by car, this summer, and it is a real long trip) and I'm pretty sure Conimbriga means 'hill fort' or something to do with a fort. It really doesn't do the place justice. It's one of the most amazing things I've seen. Unfortunately, I'm a crap writer, and I have a hard time keeping up with wikicode and the whole format around here. Kyle543 08:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Julius Caesar ended the celtic resistance around 60 BC. - The origins of the Conii is quite uncertain though Herodot lists them as an iberian tribe. Most probably the name Conimbriga does result from the Conii (there were at least two Conimbriga which I know of - one by Coimbra/ Portugal and one near Murcia/ Spain): Coni briga - Coni being the celtic name for the Conii and the celtic word brigg meaning "hill, hide-out, fort". Brigg may mean fort but doesn't have to. Take a look at german(ic) Berg/ Burg which are derived from the same indo-european stem. It's unclear how far north the Conii territory reached but at least as far as central Portugal - territory which was later on occupied by lusitanian and celtiberian tribes. Take a look at the situation around 200 BC: http://arkeotavira.com/Mapas/Iberia/Populi.htm - From the tartessic/ conian Keition to Conimbriga that's just slightly over 200 km. Not that far away! It is plausible. --84.167.214.160 12:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first element of the placename is more likely to mean "high place" (see the reference in the article as now amended, plus amongst others Adrian Room Placenames of the World pub. McFarland 2006). -- Picapica (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conímbriga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conímbriga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]