Talk:Comus (band)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Cover Version
[edit]If someone cares, Current93 made a cover version of "Diana" --217.85.89.55 10:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
The Current 93 section of this article is atrocious and unsourced. I'm going to fix it and if anyone has a problem they can do whatever they like, but as it stands it's an uncited advertisment for the band.76.24.115.139 (talk) 08:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Blood Donor
[edit]Are the Keith Hale and Graham Caxon who're listed in personnel the same chaps who went on to play in Blood Donor in the late '70s; and Hawkwind, Toyah etc in Hale's case? I'm inclined to think it's probably a coincidence because of how much earlier Comus were around, but it'd be interesting to find out.
—Chris (blather • contribs • e) 20:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
they are the same
Fair use rationale for Image:Comus 1971.jpg
[edit]BetacommandBot 23:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC) FUR added for this article --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 20:39, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
????
[edit]the LATE 2000's? the album magically appeared in 1971? animal-like vocals? like turtles and shit? get a grip!--209.6.193.6 (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? Rodhullandemu 00:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Comus (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125091949/http://comusmusic.co.uk/news.html to http://www.comusmusic.co.uk/news.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125091949/http://comusmusic.co.uk/news.html to http://www.comusmusic.co.uk/news.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125091949/http://comusmusic.co.uk/news.html to http://www.comusmusic.co.uk/news.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)