Talk:Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 16, 2017, June 16, 2020, and June 16, 2021.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Company or corporation

In all IBM documentation I have seen, it is the CTR Company, not the CTR Corporation. Is this something that should be changed?

Of course! How funny to have worked on getting details right all these years and yet the name was wrong! Someone logged on will have to move the article to the correct name. Computing Scale Corporation was also changed to ... Company (the stock prospectus shows it as Computing Scale Company of American). 69.106.229.36 (talk) 07:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct or renamed

Is defunct really the same as renamed? Defunct gives the idea of dead, nonexistent, failed - when that isn't really the case. Maybe the box should say "renamed"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.65.75 (talk) 03:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to History of IBM

Should this page merge to History of IBM? Comment here, please. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a merge template that states "It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into History of IBM. (Discuss) Proposed since May 2011." There is a similar template over on the History of IBM article. There has been little or no real discussions of the reasons for the proposed merger, the pros and cons, or statements of support for and against on either talk page. Since this has been unresolved for just about a year, I propose that we abandon the proposed merge and remove the merge templates from both articles. I'll wait a few days and if there is no objection, I'll go ahead and remove the templates. -Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - With no responses to the above or a similar request over on Talk:History of IBM, I've gone ahead and deleted the merge templates from both articles. -Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 04:36, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]