Talk:Compugen Inc.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

[Untitled]

The page on Compugen Inc is currently flagged because a major contributor has a potential conflict of interest. The contents should be reviewed by the community in order to decide whether the potential conflict of interest has any bearing on the contents. I would like to have any evident bias pointed out so that it can be removed. It is in the nature of private business that the only people with any direct knowledge of or interest in the business usually have some friendly or adversarial connection to it and therefore have a potential conflict of interest, as this present writer does.Jda2602 (talk) 00:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True, but no apparent bias

While I recommend the Closely-Related warning remain on this page, as someone who's been variously a competitor and a customer of Compugen, I don't see any immediate problems here. Obviously, none of the negative coverage (e.g. financial difficulties) are included - only the good parts are mentioned - but what's here appears to be correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athompso99 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

-where is the TALK article in question? Not showing up in "View History" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.51.136.238 (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Compugen Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205214632/http://www.compugen.com/news/newsitems/CompugenCiscoSolutionPartnerOfTheYearEN.pdf to http://www.compugen.com/news/newsitems/CompugenCiscoSolutionPartnerOfTheYearEN.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]