Talk:Compton edge

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spectroscopy (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy

Graph description?!?

The graph at the bottom of the article (Compton_Diagram.jpg) is really nice, as it's not only showing how the Compton edge is supposed to look like, but as it actually does look like. Unfortunately there's no description to it, why these effects occur. I would add it, if I'd know the reasons, but these were what I was looking for, so obviously it has to be done by someone else. --MarsmanRom, 2007.11.22, 11:20(GMT+1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.43.121 (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also

The article could say something about what really happens, such as multiple scattering. That is, the theoretical curve arises from the supposition that there is a single photon-electron interaction for each photon, but the photon resultin from the interaction with a lower frequency can "Compton interact" with other electrons.--201.213.220.35 (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The graph should also show and mention a back-scattering peak since it is a common feature of such plots. I'm confused what the trapezoid means--the one just to the left of the photo-peak. Pulu (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good article. We should remove the "issue" at the top of the page.

Edit: Removed.

The descriptions given in the article are concise and accurate. They are obviously written by experts. How many sources do you need to cite if the physics is known?

Many mathematics articles do not cite very many sources because they define everything within the article. In this one for example, the process of Compton scattering is defined physically, and then used to (e.g.) describe the presence of the continuum of the Compton scattering process.

Therefore I believe we should remove the label from the top saying that this page needs more citations. Squalbert (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]