Talk:Compliance (physiology)

Medicine: Cardiology / Pulmonology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as High-importance).

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

Merger

They shouldn't be merged. A bladder has a certain compliance, along with veins etc. Compliance is a unit in itself. 16:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The pulmonary compliance page seems be about the same thing, but is more specific. However, they don't seem large enough to need to be independent articles. --PhiJ (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put them together, there is no reason for them to be apart! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.65.151 (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, just put the pulmonary part under another header. Otherwise it's a bit confusing, if you search compliance it looks like there's only stuff on the CVS. -Sophie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.80.123.36 (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We merged both into one in the German article, allowing to discuss common concepts in one place only. No complaints about it until now... -- http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Ront —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.55.240 (talk) 08:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any need for the paragraph about vulcanization? Explaining the chemical process seems a bit off topic here. 187.62.219.102 (talk) 13:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Numerical estimates?

It would be helpful to give in a couple of cases some actual numerical values. For example - aorta compliance or systemic arterial compliance. What are some typical values for the volume of the entire system, typical pressure and volume changes, and hence finally numerical value for the compliance itself? Since it is a life or death issue, it would be great to have typical values for a healthy system and for a diseased system. Or compliance values for some other organs. Something concrete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.195.23 (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to add the same comment. Examples of physiological values would be helpful to have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.211.160.162 (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]