Talk:Comparison of user interface markup languages
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
In what sense is the "Development Environment" column meant to be used here? I ask because XAML can be produced with a text editor (just as almost every other language). Visual Studio obviously provides some accelerators and hooks for the dev process, but it certainly isn't necessary. XAML is compiled down into binary XAML (BAML) by either the VS compiler or MSBuild; in that sense, it needs MS products but only for compilation. XAML can also be generated by the new forms part of VS or by Sparkle.--Calebbell 20:27, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
Is SVG considered a user interface markup language? --Dan 14:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Re: SVG
[edit]No, SVG is NOT a user interfae markup language.
--Charles Iliya Krempeaux 23:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
XIML is missing
[edit]Ok, maybe it's dead... MrMorgana 14:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
XAML's vector graphics
[edit]Can XAML's vector graphic be listed somewhere as a feature? I think so far it's unique among these languages. R8Rooy 14:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
New contender: JavaFX
[edit]http://www.sun.com/software/javafx/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.83.250.2 (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Comparison of user interface markup languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111129210127/http://qt.nokia.com/products/developer-tools to http://qt.nokia.com/products/developer-tools/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060718215239/http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/7/2/ to http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/7/2/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060718021800/http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/44/2/ to http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/44/2/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002034023/http://research.edm.uhasselt.be/~uiml/wiki/Main_Page to http://research.edm.uhasselt.be/~uiml/wiki/Main_Page
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100501081826/http://vexi.sourceforge.net/Vexi to http://vexi.sourceforge.net/Vexi
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060718215239/http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/7/2/ to http://www.innoscript.org/content/view/7/2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)