Talk:Comparative effectiveness research

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is this term CER used outside the USA

Is this just a political phrase used in the USA or does it have wider use ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that in practice your suggestion is correct. The `CER' terminology adds nothing except the convenience of being able to talk about supposedly policy-relevant research in evidence based medicine while avoiding talk about costs, which is for some reason seen as heinous by many American policymakers. Then by avoiding talk about costs the research ceases to be policy-relevant anyway. The term cost-effectiveness analysis (and economic evaluation more broadly) has long been used outside the USA. Health technology assessment is also analogous. Recommended reading: Weinstein & Skinner (2010)^[1] and Culyer (2010)^[2] --ChrisSampson87 (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Weinstein, Milton; Skinner, Jonathan (2010). "Comparative Effectiveness and Health Care Spending — Implications for Reform". NEJM. 362: 460–465. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb0911104.
^ Culyer, Anthony (2010). "Perspective and Desire in Comparative Effectiveness Research". PharmacoEconomics. 28 (10): 889–897. doi:10.2165/11535270-000000000-00000.

[1] Weinstein, Milton; Skinner, Jonathan (2010). "Comparative Effectiveness and Health Care Spending — Implications for Reform". NEJM. 362: 460–465. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb0911104.

[2] Culyer, Anthony (2010). "Perspective and Desire in Comparative Effectiveness Research". PharmacoEconomics. 28 (10): 889–897. doi:10.2165/11535270-000000000-00000.

[1]

[2]