Talk:Company union

A fact from Company union appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the first company union in the United States was created by John D. Rockefeller, Jr., in response to the bad publicity generated by the Ludlow massacre?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/September.

Wikipedia

Organized Labour High‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

In the U.S., at least, company unions are an important issue. Although federal law outlaws company unions, the issue has arisen recently in light of a number of developments: An AFL-CIO push for labor-management cooperation; a push by legal expert Charles Morris and a number of unions for member-only minority unions; and the role employers play in card-check union recognition under American law. The National Labor Relations Board has recently suggested (in the Kentucky River cases) that employer cooperation with unions in signing neutrality and/or card-check agreements illegally taints the union and turns it into a company union. I think the issue is much more important than "Mid". - Tim1965 22:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's a real article now

I'm woefully aware that my attempt to give this article an international scope is sadly lacking. It's the best I could do in my spare time without hitting the library. Still, I think it's a decent opening salvo. — Scartol · Talk 08:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New resource

Professor Jonathan Rees has just sent a new book to the publisher on this subject, with a considerable amount of new material. I have read the first few chapters, and i think this will be a significant contribution to the topic of company unions. Jonathan's web page is here:

http://faculty.colostate-pueblo.edu/jonathan.rees/

I don't know the release date.

Richard Myers 09:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==

This article is mistaken. It redirects from business unionism to here, and it calls company unionism the same as business unionism, but this is untrue. Business unionism and company unionism are not the same thing. Company unions are actually run by the companies themselves. Business unionism is an ideology that holds that emphasizes running unions in a businesslike manner and cooperating with businesses as the "practical" road forward for labor. Gompers, for example, was a business unionist but not a company unionist.

Thirdcamper, 2010

Agree completely with the observation that this is an inappropriate destination for the Business unionism redirect. However, the problem is not with this file, it is with that redirect file. I have temporarily assigned the link to Labor aristocracy, which discusses some aspects of business unionism. But that is also not a perfect redirect destination. If no one knows of a better destination, i think it would be appropriate to create a new page specifically for business unionism. Richard Myers (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Company union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup references/notes

Currently this article uses old school academic references without direct linking, making it hard to verify sources, while linking to references in notes section. It's not breaking any rules, but would be nice to make it comply with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout and clean up. Shushugah (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]