Talk:Communist Party of Sweden (1995)

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Shortly thereafter, the entire KU district in Gävleborg joined APK."?

- No, it didn´t! My parents (for example) continued to be leading figures in KU also after the split.--194.71.24.5 10:05, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but didn't the district change affiliation en bloc? which doesn't necessarily mean that all individuals in the district joined APK. --Soman 14:58, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, there was rather some individuals THAT DID LEFT. The en bloc stayed.--83.226.184.147 17:44, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why (1995)?

Why is that part of the article name? It doesn't seem very fitting. Obviously, some distinction has to be made to differentiate it from the other Communist parties of Sweden, existing and former, but "(1995)" doesn't feel right. Jobjörn 21:43, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It goes in line with how other parties with identical names are differentiated. 1995 is the year the party was legally refounded with the name SKP. --Soman 09:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Split article

Should this article be split? (and a separte formed for APK) APK and SKP are the same essentially in every aspect except for the legal, but perhaps it would be easier to describe the historical development of APK in a separate article (and the events leading up to its formation). --Soman 15:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holodomor denial

Iw ould be worth mentioning somewhere in the article that the party engages in Holodomor denial. http://www.skp.se/levande_historia/ukraina.htm --Dorpater (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New logo

The party has decided on a new logo, returning to the hammer and sickle. I don't think there is any file on Commons yet. http://solidnet.org/article/CP-of-Sweden-The-Swedish-communist-reclaim-the-hammer-and-sickle/ https://skp.se/2024/10/19/kommunisterna-atertar-hammaren-och-skaran/ Sjö (talk) 05:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]