Talk:Communist Party of Slovakia

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Split in two articles

This article contains information of two different parties separated by sections. I think they should be two different articles. The information abou the new party has to go to Communist Party of Slovakia (1992) or the old party has to go to Communist Party of Slovakia (old party). -- Magioladitis 10:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think, it would be ok to let the current party stay and let the older party shift to Communist Party of Slovakia (1939). --Soman 10:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I think this split is obvious. Can you do it? -- Magioladitis 10:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]