Talk:Commotion Ltd v Rutty
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 26 October 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Akaibu (talk · contribs) on 18 October 2024. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Lexology
[edit]I add a reference to a Lexology article. I'm unsure how reliable it is:
- Freer, Gary; Thompson, Sarah (21 July 2014). "Flexible working request extended to all employees". Lexology. Lexology. Retrieved 27 October 2024. - Discusses continued relevance of the Commotion Ltd v Rutty case after major legislation in 2014.
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Lexology.com
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 204#Law firm publications - discusses the reliability of both Lexology and law firm journals
--A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 00:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)