Talk:Commonwealth Nations Bridge Championships
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Championship(s)
[edit]At a glance, I agree with the conclusion by User:Awo that the singular is appropriate, but I disagree with the reasoning. We should say "Championship" because there is only one tournament, or competition (as we often say), or event (as they say re Olympic Games, at least). We should say "Championships" where there are multiple championships conferred, most commonly where at least one of women, seniors, or juniors compete alongside open competition.
At most, the use of singular or plural at an official website should govern the title of an article here. (Proper nouns used by WBF, EBL, and ACBL vary so much, even in naming one competition, that I think we should go further and impose some consistency in full names.) --P64 (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Commonwealth Nations Bridge Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120502125753/http://www.abf.com.au/events/cnbc/2006/ to http://www.abf.com.au/events/cnbc/2006/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)