Talk:Common planigale

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Common planigale is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Pygmy Planigale?

Should this really be called "Pygmy Planigale"? It is actually the largest species of Planigale! I know Groves used the name but that's no reason to use a name that is in fact incorrect. Ucucha 17:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

laughs - Well, email Groves and find out what he has to say for himself. He's good at responding quickly. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ucucha 20:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He wrote that Pygmy Planigale was indeed incorrect and suggested Common Planigale as a better name. I'll move the page. Ucucha 10:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

is it spotted?

Description does not mention if it is spotted: if not, why maculata? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardson mcphillips (talk • contribs) 03:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]