Jump to content

Talk:Common galaxias

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This image is of such poor qulity as to be practically useless. Furthermore, G.maculatus does not have a dark horizontal stripe along its lower sides behind the pectoral fins as these fish apparently do. The only related species that I can find that does have such a stripe is Galaxiella pusilla. Note also the apparent thin "neon" like line above the dark line, also characeristic of G.pusilla. This image has been nominated for deletion in the Commons and given its very poor utility in being able to identify G.maculatus if there is no reason given within 24 hours as to why this should not be done, I wll remove the image again from this page. Nick Thorne talk 09:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it only took eight years, but I replaced the taxobox image with an only-slightly-better lithograph of the species. Will try to source some better ones from the NZ Department of Conservation. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 09:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common galaxias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]