Talk:Common Entrance Examination
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Common Entrance Examination article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Independent Schools Examinations Board page were merged into Common Entrance Examination on 11 September 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Untitled
[edit]I have improved the introduction and removed the Context tag since I hope there is now enough context. I also changed the Interviews section which was written in the second person. I think the article could still benefit from some careful attention, as it reads more like an advertisement for the exam than like an encyclopedia article. The references could be improved and perhaps there might be a section on the history of the exam? Educres (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC) There are many "independent senior schools" that are not "public schools" and many "independent junior schools" that are not "preparatory schools". Generally, it is only public schools and prep schools that use Common Entrance, not the other independent schools (which more often set their own exams). Therefore, I think it is best to use those terms. I have added an indication that both are types of independent school in the hope that that clarifies. Educres (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Personally, I think that the Criticism paragraph is biased. Unless references can be cited to support the author's assertion, this paragraph should be removed.Paul C Goddard (talk) 12:36, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose that Independent Schools Examinations Board be merged into Common Entrance Examination (or vice-versa). The (very little) content in the ISEB article could easily be explaoined in the context of the CEE article, or it might be considered that the ISEB should be the parent article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Common Entrance Examination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150831075556/http://www.iseb.co.uk/getmedia/f402fb5d-3191-4d25-9756-1d54aa5bdf71/Timetable-CE-11-Autumn-2015.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf to https://www.iseb.co.uk/getmedia/f402fb5d-3191-4d25-9756-1d54aa5bdf71/Timetable-CE-11-Autumn-2015.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016211337/http://www.iseb.co.uk/getmedia/80e6a4e7-baa4-4a2f-8db0-24ded554790c/Timetable-CE-13-Summer-2015.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf to https://www.iseb.co.uk/getmedia/80e6a4e7-baa4-4a2f-8db0-24ded554790c/Timetable-CE-13-Summer-2015.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235949/http://www.isc.co.uk/ParentZone_CommonEntrance.htm to http://www.isc.co.uk/ParentZone_CommonEntrance.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 11 August 2017 (UTC)