Jump to content

Talk:Commercial sorghum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Locales

[edit]

I'm going to add "Rwanda" on to this list: "In Nigeria, Lesotho and South Africa, sorghum is used to produce beer." The local brew in Kigali (and perhaps other parts, though I didn't see any up north) is called Primus, and it is also a sorghum beer. Anglican 05:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It gets unnecessarily untidy when articles start list every single nation or state by name, especially for trivial points such as this. Once the list gets over 3 or 4 long replace it with a generic. In this case "southern Africa".

Is Ethiopian injera sometimes made from sorghum? If so, that needs a citation. It's made with teff, according to the Wikipedia injera article. ThreeRocks (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet sorghum

[edit]

There seems to be a contradition between this page and the "Sorghum bicolor" page. One states that sweet sorghum is a varity that produces sweet, juicy grains and is thus equivalent to sweet corn. The the other claims that that sweet sorghum is synonymous with forage sorghum, ie stock feed.Ethel Aardvark 08:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

I disagree with a merge because I believe each species should have it's own article, and this article is more about the commerical production and wouldn't not contain that much information about the individual species. Million_Moments 07:39, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (Durra)

[edit]

While I originally would have thought the Durra should merge into Sorghum bicolor, but given the discussion above, it seems that the local names may refer to a number of species, and therefore the human usage aspects of Sorghum should go here. This seems reasonable, and the Durra article has a couple of things that should be salvaged for this article before changing to redirect here. T L Miles (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving content from Durra to this article and/or Sorghum bicolor, then making Durra a redirect. Where it should redirect to depends on how specific the name is: if Durra means just the one species, it should redirect there. It seems more likely that it's a general term for sorghum, so it's appropriate to redirect here. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 12:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged it into Sorghum bicolor. It seems that all cultivated sorghum is now thought to be part of S. bicolor, so that made more sense. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming the article to Sorghum

[edit]

A discussion is underway on the talk page Sorghum, on changing the wiki article title as follows [1] leave current titles as they are, or [2] change the title Commercial sorghum to Sorghum, and Sorghum to Sorghum (genus)

Comments from other wiki editors are welcome. Please visit: Talk:Sorghum#Removal_of_species_specific_material ApostleVonColorado (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Sorghum - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 05:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sorghum which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorghum and bio-ethanol

[edit]

It would be useful for there to be a whole subsection dedicated to the use of sorghum as a source of bio-fuel, and some mention of dual-purpose (grain and bio-ethanol) varieties—GRM (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

US

[edit]

What evidence is there for the statement that the syrup is not common in the Southern U.S. these days?211.225.33.104 (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Commercial sorghum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commercial sorghum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commercial sorghum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commercial sorghum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Staple crop comparison table

[edit]

Please see Template_talk:Comparison_of_major_staple_foods#Fresh/dry_comparisons regarding a proposed change to the template transcluded in this article. SmartSE (talk) 12:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]