Jump to content

Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Failing article solely because the prose (and WP:MOS issues) is not up to GA standards. Here are a few examples (these are just a few, there maybe even more)
  • Coming Up to Breathe is the fifth major label, full-length studio album from MercyMe.
  • Released in on April 25, 2006,
  • Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews from critics
  • "Something Like You" has been compared to the sound of U2 (particularly the song "Where The Streets Have No Name"),[6] while "3:42 a.m. (Writer's Block)" has been described as 'soulful classic rock'
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    "Background" has basically every period cited with FN#1 which makes the article look even more clumsy
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Saying "Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews." is being biased
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Active users have been reverting vandalism, which was last done back in mid November 2011
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Mercyme cutb.jpg does not comply with WP:NFCC; its rational is very very weak and does not give a suitable reasoning on why a non-free artwork gives any educational value. The second file completely fails WP:NFCC.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I suggest you fixed all of these concerns, get it copy edited, allow others to give it a WP:PR and then re-nominate at a later date. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 23:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]