This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted on 28 March 2014 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
What's the Wikipedia policy on removing real names at the request of the person in question? I don't feel good about removing publicly known, albeit somewhat hard to find, information from an encyclopedia just because that person doesn't like that information to be publicly known. --Mudd1 (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The twopolicies seem to answer every question but this one! On the one hand, "the subject's full name, if known [not if there are no objections], should be given in the lead sentence." On the other hand, "it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object" might apply to the two clauses — secondary sources and self-published sources — instead of just the latter. Only birthdays are mentioned as specific things that should be removed upon request.
If quality of sources is the only issue, thesethreearticles (from the same day), tilt the argument in favor of naming CBG19. If she becomes as successful as I hope she does, her name becoming widely known is inevitable anyway. Connor Behan (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
