Talk:Comet Group

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Comet Group is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with ProLine (company) on 25 November 2015. The result of the discussion was Keep separate articles.

Archives

/Archive 1 until end of 2010

Removed mention of NDC

I have removed mention of the National Distribution Center in Corby, Northamptonshire. It doesn't exist anymore, Comet have moved to a new system consisting of solely using RDC's (Regional Distribution Centers) Negashark (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

Per the MoS, "the date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on article talk." The format that has been consistently used since 7 January 2009 is that of dmy (eg 9 June 2001). Please do not alter dates to the American mdy (eg June 9, 2001) style. Keristrasza (talk) 01:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

Seemed too pithy, tbh. There should be some mention of the larger controversies eg the industry price fixing and extended warranty investigations - and the Microsoft piracy thing may be worth mentioning - but looking at the article (and the company) as a whole, nit picking seems undue. Keristrasza (talk) 09:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Current Situation

The title explains it!--88.111.116.8 (talk) 16:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

£2?

"Kesa sold Comet to private equity firm OpCapita for £2 in 2011.", from third paragraph. Don't know the correct figure to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.26.31 (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't need to be changed: £2 is the correct figure. Keri (talk) 20:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with ProLine (company)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to keep the pages separate. Keri (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose "ProLine is a range of own brand electronic products made by Darty plc for BCC in the Netherlands, Darty in France and Vandenborre in Belgium." Comet was the UK retailer for ProLine, not the sole retailer. Darty still exists. Keri (talk) 23:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Keri. Rwendland (talk) 15:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comet Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121214193118/http://storage.comet.co.uk/www/splash/html/store_closures.htm to http://storage.comet.co.uk/www/splash/html/store_closures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]