Talk:Combs, Derbyshire
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Population
[edit]Anyone got a good figure for the population? To quote the Save Combs School website: "They're still getting the petition numbers wrong. There were 2141 signatures - that's about three times the population of our small village of Combs" implying a population of around 700.
Also interesting to note that DCC use Wikipedia as a source of facts about the county they govern ( See[1])WhaleyTim (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
"Phones"?
[edit]Quote: "There are some local residents who prefer the older pronunciation of Combs to rhyme with "phones"." Wouldn't 'loams' or 'domes' make more sense? Not a local so decided not to be bold... Dave.Dunford (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Combs, Derbyshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20040520215248/http://www.combsschool.ik.org/ to http://www.combsschool.ik.org/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090514093214/http://www.combsvillagehall.org.uk/ to http://combsvillagehall.org.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)