Jump to content

Talk:Combe Down

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article needs additional references

[edit]

Hi, I tagged the article as the following sections have no references at all

  • Stone mines
  • Site of Roman Villa
  • De Montalt Mill
  • Local flora

Does anyone have any sources they can add to verify these sections? --Pontificalibus (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added several references to the sections which lacked them (& removed the banner) hopefully these are now satisfactory.— Rod talk 14:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Village category

[edit]

The village category of Combe Down is tricky. It was never a village during the existence of Bath and North East Somerset, as it was absorbed into Bath in the 1950s, and is no longer a village. In this respect it is in the same position as Twerton and Weston, Bath which do not use a Village category. So for correctness these three should either be in Category:Villages in Somerset as a former Somerset village, or in no Village category reflecting the current position as with Twerton and Twerton. I'm inclined to drop the Village category. Views? Rwendland (talk) 10:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the place, so perhaps it isn't really a village in any sense; but the article describes it as a village several times (talking about the present day), so if that's justified, then I think it can also be categorized as a village.--Kotniski (talk) 10:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It should definitely be in Category:Districts of Bath, Somerset & Category:Electoral wards in Bath and North East Somerset each of which cover the whole area, however the small area around the church, shops & as far as Firs Field is known by locals (my parents in law live there) as "the village" - being the traditional centre rather than newer housing estates etc. I think this reflects difficulties in definition of what is a village, which doesn't mean anything in ONS Census data or local government circles.— Rod talk 10:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

There has been some good work going on with this article recently however I would suggest that the external links list is getting too long. Wikipedia:External links gives some guidance but I would suggest removing the Nursery, Doctors surgery, garage, primary school, cricket clubs and the photograph collections (this is what the link to the Wikimedia Commons category should be doing. I would also suggest that the list of listed buildings would be better in prose and perhaps only include those which are particularly significant per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists. There are also significant sections of the text which are not supported by citations Wikipedia:Verifiability explains why this is important and Wikipedia:Citing sources explains various ways to do this (but if you need any help with this let me know).— Rod talk 19:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked a little more closely I note there are a lot of unverified claims which need citations to support them. I would also suggest using the guidelines and suggestions for article structure and content, laid out at Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements, which seems to have been changed recently. Using national guidelines helps the reader to navigate through consistent formats of multiple pages.— Rod talk 11:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Storm of 1987.

[edit]

I wonder if it's worth having a section on the storm of 1987 and the effects on Rainbow Wood.

I remember as a kid the wood being closed for some time after while they cleared it all... which was quite sad. I'd love to see photos of before and after. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.35.155 (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combe Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Combe Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Combe Down. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Combe_Down&oldid=1206756332"