This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
the meaning of watershed is ambiguous. originally meaning the dividing line between drainage basins it has also come to mean drainage basins themselves, particularly in north american english. So the unambiguous drainage basin is preferred. I changed the caption to the map accordingly. (also the figurative use of watershed makes no sense for the second newer meaning.)--Mongreilf (talk) 07:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In order for Geobox to generate a valid region: code for the coordinates, the United States has to be listed first. I don't like it, but that's how Geobox currently works. If you put Canada as the first country, it generates region:CA-X. As far as I know, the order in which countries are listed in a Geobox has no other significance. --Stepheng3 (talk) 08:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. All I knew it changed was the order of the "countries" field. Given there's a technical reason for needing it to be ordered a certain way, I have no objections for you to re-fix it. tedder (talk) 13:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
