Talk:Colonial French

United States: Franco-Americans / Louisiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Franco-Americans (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Louisiana portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as High-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Colonial French was copied or moved into Louisiana French with this edit on 28 June 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Louisiana stub]] on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

Bwah?

There is some major-league wrong here:

The references to “Napoleonic French” are, just as Eklir says, without basis in reality. I have a link here that says Louisiana French is three varieties: Cajun, Creole and Colonial. So references to Napoleonic French, whatever that is, must go.
Colonial French was spoken by original colonists and not by Creoles. It refers to the standard French of America before the purchase, and not typically the French of either Creoles or Cajuns. This is the opposite of what the article currently says. References to Creole French belong on the Lousiana Creole French page.
Plantation Society French was a prestige dialect within the larger substrate of Louisiana Creole French. Neither have anything to do with Colonial French.

Major rewrites to follow.... Muckapedia 07:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I believe "Creole" is being used here in its original sense - the original white colonists and their descendants. Plantation Society French is being discussed here, so far as I can tell, because it is/was usually considered to be identical with Colonial French in the past. According to LSU Colonial French is largely considered to have melded into Cajun, though speakers of Cajun may additionally use "society" French.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Napoleonic French"

What exactly does that mean in a Louisiana context? Funnyhat (talk) 05:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's just an urban legend, it has no linguistic basis in reality. Eklir (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plantation Society French (PST) = Colonial French (CF)?

This article bases its claim that these two varieties of Louisiana French are the same on Picone (2003). However, Picone's own claim is that PST was a high-prestige variety of French which attempted to replace the low-prestige CF of the early colonists. This has to be sorted out in this article. Eklir (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC) «[reply]

Recent edits

This edit introduced some errors, evidently based on errors in the infobox. The sources describe Colonial/Plantation Society French and Cajun/Louisiana Regional French as two forms of Louisiana French, along with Louisiana Creole French. They do not mention Missouri French, which is distinct (and was not spoken in Louisiana, or really in "American South").Cúchullain ^t/c 20:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Louisiana French, Colonial French, Cajun French?

From my understanding, Acadian French was brought and mergered with "Colonial French" to create Cajun French. So then what about Louisiana French? How did Colonial French come from Louisiana French, if Louisiana French is the "current" of today? I am very confused as to why this is all necessary. Savvyjack23 (talk) 00:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the "phonology" for this language? It has a language box and yet cannot explain its necessary differences. Savvyjack23 (talk) 00:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is unnecesarry and confusing

Why does this exist? It gives no examples to differentiate the language from what is said in the Louisiana French article. Whoever keeps adding in the name "Choctaw Patois" needs to stop as well. That is not a name in common usage and confuses the language. This article needs serious revisions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.50.95.2 (talk) 23:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Colonial French. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colonial French. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914032410/http://appl003.lsu.edu/artsci/frenchweb.nsf/$Content/Cajun+French+Definition?OpenDocument to http://appl003.lsu.edu/artsci/frenchweb.nsf/$Content/Cajun+French+Definition?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]