Talk:Colombian Communist Party

Colombia High‑importance

	Colombia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colombia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Colombia-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ColombiaWikipedia:WikiProject ColombiaTemplate:WikiProject ColombiaColombia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2021 and 12 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Totoama. Peer reviewers: Fudgevillain, Gmd114.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup template

I rewrote the last section which was just God awful. The rest of the page someone else can rewrite.Travb 10:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Colombiancp logo.PNG

Image:Colombiancp logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV-Check

The persecution section seems to be biased towards the PCC and on such a sensitve subject the who article merits review. Tennekis^(rant) 04:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good if you could be more specific on which wordings are problematic to you. Some possible refs;

On the petition on the political genocide against UP-PCC to the Interamerican Commission for Human Rights, [1]
On the special protection programme for survivors of the persecution of PCC, Interior Ministry, UNCHR
Amnesty report from 2006
On persecution of female relatives of PCC members, CIDH report from 2006

--Soman (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV tag followup

This article has been tagged since 2008. It looks like it has undergone quite a bit of editing since then, so would anyone object to removing the tag? Or what concerns still remain? --El on ka 01:17, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]