Talk:Colloidal crystal

Colloidal crystal was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 12, 2009). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

An email has been received at VRTS concerning some or all of the text on this page, and can be read as ticket:2009010410012318 by users with a VRTS account.

However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for the text because see User:Sphilbrick/OTRS summary.

For an update on the issue, please contact the user who added this template to the page, someone else with a VRTS account, or the VRT noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by a VRT volunteer, the text will be deleted.

Untitled

I think this addresses the "not for grade school children" ego attitude. I don't think anybody wanted you to write on that level. But it is an encyclopedia and unskilled people are going to read it to learn about a subject. You might as well make that easy for them. --InsufficientData (talk) 16:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page is starting to look good! Abce2 (talk) 02:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Abce2[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Colloidal crystal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article needs major rewriting to reach GA level. Things to do:

1) Copyedit. The text lacks coherent flow of sentences and many of them defy common sense. Just to give few examples:

1st sentence: "A colloidal crystal is a highly ordered array of particles that are formed in varying sizes (from a few millimeters to one centimeter)" - reads as nonsense: particles are formed (where?) in cm sizes.
2nd sentence: "A natural example of this phenomenon .." what phenomenon? We were talking about object, i.e. crystal.
".. in the gem opal, where the parts of pure spectral color result from close-packed domains of colloidal spheres" - parts of color .. result in a crystal ??
3rd sentence: "The spherical particles precipitate in very siliceous pools" - very siliceous? How comes siliceous covers all colloidal crystals?
And this all is trying to define a basic object.

** Note: Most of these comments are erroneous, insulting and inaccurate. This is what I typically get from this editor. The reference to "nonsense" is an example of the destructive and non-cummunicative level of criticism. -- logger9 (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"two-dimensional triangular lattice, while a body-centered cubic structure" - cubic lattice can not be triangular.

etc. Then I would clarify numerous jargon, such as kT, etc and provide missing wikilinks.
2) Define the subject. Mention how it relates to and differs from usual crystals
3) Describe its basic properties: composition, morphology, stability, chemical, mechanical, electrical, optical, etc., properties. Especially important is to discuss how the individual particles and their regular arrangement contribute to those properties.
4) Look around for appropriate pictures. There are plenty on WP and commons.
5) Return to the lead and rewrite it to summarize the article.
6) Provide references and format them. Although I would encourage using "cite journal" and "cite book" templates, this is not obligatory. What is required though is (i) doi links for journals (ii) ISBN and page numbers for books.

This is a minimum, after which a review can start. Good luck. Materialscientist (talk) 03:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colloidal crystal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212171849/http://www1.phys.uu.nl/scm/research.htm to http://www1.phys.uu.nl/scm/research.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]