Talk:College GameDay (basketball TV program)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Issue

Any reason why people decided to make up 2008 Gameday games? At least cleanup the USC-UCLA game considering ESPN does not even have a contract with the Pac 10.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on College GameDay (basketball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on College GameDay (basketball). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 November 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 18:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– There are several sports-related TV programs that are awaiting a "permanent" naming solution, so I'm going to start with these two as the "test case". Both of these are American TV series, and both air on ESPN, so they can't be disambiguated from each other by either "country" or "network". Disambiguating them by year is effectively not WP:RECOGNIZABLE. So, the "best" way to disambiguate these is, actually, "by sport"! As per WP:NCTV, we should add the word "TV program" to these, to make clear to readers that this isn't something else (e.g. a radio program or a book, or whatever), so I'm proposing these be moved to include "TV program" in the disambiguation. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I've thought a lot about this since I knew this was going to eventually turn up. As IJBall says, country, network and "genre" are the same so can't be used. Year can be used, and maybe it should, as it technically can work, but it probably would not help a lot. It seems for sport shows from the same source this would probably be the best option. Weaker support for year if that is where the consensus goes. --Gonnym (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's where I am – this proposal is better than "by year" disambiguation (by a lot in this case, IMO), but "by year" follows NCTV so is an OK second choice.... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 12:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - while I strongly suspect the football program is a solid primary topic, this move is at least more correct for now. -- Netoholic @ 20:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.