Colin Thiele bibliography is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
As I created this page, it's obvious I would oppose its deletion.
My reason for this is that Wikipedia is supposed to be an exhaustive encyclopedia providing information on all topics as detailed as possible. That's supposed to be the mantra of Wikipedia. As the bibliography was deleted from the Colin Thiele page, I found it necessary to detail the bibliography of the Author, as it's position is essential.
I'm going to remove the deletion but place instead a WP: Australia and note that its content is of importance to Australian literature enthusiasts.
Lincalinca00:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. However, I will now submit the article to WP:AFD to for wider discussion. There is no precedent in Wikipedia for such an article and I oppose creating one.--cj | talk06:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I have removed the importance rating from the {{WP Australia}} tag. I do not agree that this article is of "mid-importance" under the importance guidelines.