Talk:Cold water pitting of copper tube

Water Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

The article quotes "The corrosion rate of copper in most potable waters is less than 25 µm/year, at this rate a 15 mm tube with a wall thickness of 0.7 mm would last for about 280 years.[1]". Looks like there is a silly mistake somewhere. 0.7mm is 700µm. 700/25=28 years. The actual corrosion rate for total erosion in 280 years would be 2.5µm/year. Given copper pipes need structural integrity (for compression joints, and external in-use forces) and to resist internal water pressure, and given corrosion rates and thicknesses across an individual tube vary slightly, there will be a minimum thickness where failure becomes likely, or inevitable. Perhaps 0.4mm. This would give a maximum safe internal erosion of perhaps 300µm before a pipe is rendered unserviceable. Assuming the copper doesn't embrittle, with 2.5µm/year as a lower limit of erosion would give an upper limit of service life of 120 years. I have replaced 15mm copper in busy straight-run freshwater supply pipe, in a hard water area, failed due to erosion in 10 to 15 years.Nick Hill (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cold water pitting of copper tube. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828031255/http://www.corrosionist.com/copper_pipe_corrosion.htm to http://www.corrosionist.com/copper_pipe_corrosion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]