Talk:Coil binding

Spiral Binding Company Inc was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 March 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Coil binding. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

es Interwiki

I don't know how to do it. The Spanish version is this one: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encuadernaci%C3%B3n_en_espiral. Could someone do it?--79.153.107.15 (talk) 12:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you. Jim.henderson (talk) 11:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helix vs spiral

The article on coil binding does not allow for editing the introductory paragraph. If I could edit it, I would add the following: The term "spiral" sometimes used for coil binding is a mathematical misnomer. A spiral is a 2-dimensional geometric figure. The more apposite term would be "helix". The DNA molecule is a double helix, not a double spiral.

Donald I. Promish Burlington, Vermont 63.3.17.130 (talk) 21:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC

I don't see how editing is restricted, but thank you. I used less detail but did point out the distinction between the geometer's "spiral" and the tradesman's. Jim.henderson (talk) 12:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Often "spiral" is used to describe any movement where rotation is combined with evolution in another dimension -- whether evolving in amplitude as in the geometry spiral (or like the 2D projection of a 3D helix viewed with persepective from near one end), or instead evolving along the rotation axis as in the helix of a spiral staircase (or else even some combination of both like an Ekman spiral). Sigh. Prescriptivists.

This article showcases a picture of a binding machine which is used for comb binding/wire binding. These too are colloquially called "spiral binding" but they are not the kind of binding which this article describes; the machine appears to be the kind which is not used with a literal spiral (as in helix or a classic spring shape) of wire. Cesiumfrog (talk) 08:10, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Wrong Machine?

The "Binding Machine" shown in the picture looks very much like a comb binding machine - this is quite different from coil binding, the topic of this article. Does anyone have an image of a proper coil binding machine? 109.148.225.202 (talk) 16:55, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Binding 01.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]