Talk:Cocrystal
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MFahad1996.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Definition being debated
[edit]Volunteer1234, regarding this, noting that the definition has been debated is something to cover in the lead since it is covered lower in the article. Like I stated to you before, terminology material (including "this is a term for" material) is sometimes appropriate in the lead. The only time that "refers to" material is not appropriate for the lead is when the first sentence of an article is treating a concept as though it's a term article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- I added the broader definition to the lead. Volunteer1234 (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Volunteer1234, it still makes sense to note in the lead that disagreement over the term/topic exists. But that's better. Thanks. I wonder about the quotation marks without using WP:In-text attribution, but it was there before we showed up to the article. Hopefully, someone tweaks it by summarizing in some other way or adding author names. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:28, 6 September 2018 (UTC)