Talk:Cockerton

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

David Roberts (2008-06-10). "Officials say Wikipedia flyover rumours a hoax". The Northern Echo.

hoax coverage

Just a note, the hoax in this article about a Flyover received some coverage before it was removed:

Roberts, David (2008-06-10). "Officials say Wikipedia flyover rumours a hoax". The Northern Echo. Retrieved 2008-06-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

--Rob (talk) 04:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flyover hoax

Will you please stop removing the flyover hoax, it is a valid part of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.231.84 (talk) 17:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I have told 86.3.231.84 on their talk page, I feel that the hoax paragraph should be drastically shortened. It is way too long compared to the rest of the article. Too much attention is presently being given to a single trivial incident. Gail (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have forwarded this incident to the administrators' noticeboard. Anyone involved, please feel free to comment at Wikipedia:ANI#Cockerton. Gail (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that a comparable thing happened to Denshaw. It might be worth looking at how that article benefitted from the attention, and also how it deals with its own news. --Jza84 | Talk 23:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]