Talk:Cock o' the North (music)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Roger de Coverley
[edit]I deleted an unreferenced claim that the tune "is a development of the 17th century English tune Sir Roger de Coverley, found in Playford's Dancing Master." I've listened to Sir Roger De Coverly on YouTube, and it sounds nothing like The Cock o' the North to me, except for the time signature. There are several Google results, but they could all have been lifted from our article. Alansplodge (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Played on the bugle
[edit]This is clearly nonsense, because a bugle cannot physically play the notes of the tune. A trumpet, perhaps, but drummers were not trumpeters.
Can we review the source and see what it actually says? If it is as claimed in the source, it should be struck out altogether as it's simply not possible for it to be true. Calum (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cock o' the North (music). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120712165549/http://www.worldbookofmilitarymusic.com/marches_b_c_d.html to http://worldbookofmilitarymusic.com/marches_b_c_d.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)