Talk:Coca-Cola FEMSA

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink: Beverages Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ongoing additions of promotional material (including, without limitation, "sustainability"-related content)

Please do not continue adding unencyclopedic, promotional material to this article in Coca-Cola's voice. There are several problems with this content.

First, Wikipedia is not a webhost, it's an encyclopedia. This company presumably has its own website, and that is the appropriate place for this material, not Wikipedia.
Second, the material isn't neutral. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, neutrally written in the voice of the encyclopedia, not of any particular contributor.
Third, the material is clearly contributed under a conflict of interest, with no attempts being made to comply with Wikipedia's COI guidelines despite my having alerted the contributor to this issue via user talk page.
Fourth, in addition to being non-neutral, the material is overtly promotional, which is inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
Fifth, the material isn't based on a reliable published source, as Wikipedia requires for all contributions.
Sixth, the material appears likely to violate a copyright.

Please take some time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies and procedures before you add any more material to this article, especially if the material refers to the company in the first person as "We"... That kind of material doesn't belong on Wikipedia, for all the reasons listed above and more. Just because this is "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" doesn't mean there aren't rules, and it also doesn't mean that all content is appropriate. Best regards - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not only was it pure advertising, it was a copyright violation. See below. Voceditenore (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.coca-colafemsa.com/sustainability.html and https://www.coca-colafemsa.com/assets/files/es/Sostenibilidad/Coca-Cola-FEMSA-Sustainability-Report-2015.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]