Talk:Coated abrasive

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Woodworking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WoodworkingWikipedia:WikiProject WoodworkingTemplate:WikiProject WoodworkingWoodworking

Metalworking

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking

Technology

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Sand paper

How is this any different than sand paper. Based on what the article says, this is just another article about sand paper. If this is true then why aren't they merged? Wizard191 (talk) 03:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sandpaper" is just one narrow form of the vast family of "abrasive grains stuck to a sheet" products. However there's certainly scope for merging. I'm also concerned with the name Coated abrasive itself: for most makers of such things, a "coated" abrasive is one where the sheet is dressed with an additional anti-clogging substance afterwards. Although we could potentially have both a broad and narrow "sandpaper" article at the same time, this isn't the best name to give the broad article. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you are saying makes perfect sense. I just have one question. I haven't encountered (at least that I can remember right now) an "abrasive stuck to a sheet" that isn't called sandpaper. I would appreciate it if you could list a couple of examples so that it makes sense to have a broad and narrow article.

In any case, I totally agree that the name must be changed. Wizard191 (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some obvious examples would be those used by powered machines, typically in industry:

You'd be hard-pressed to describe any of these as "sandpaper", even though their common ancestry is obvious. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...I see what you are saying. I would call those sandpaper around the shop, but technically they aren't.

Upon a little bit of googling it looks like "coated abrasive" is the proper term: http://www.uama.org/Coated101.html. Wizard191 (talk) 17:29, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added some pic's of assorted coated abrasives. May help differentiate them from regular sand paper. Alister 77 (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

merge?

Should this be merged with "Abrasive"? "Bonded abrasive" no longer has its own page. Wilhkar (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)wilhkar[reply]

2021 merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Emery cloth and Coated abrasive to Sandpaper; overlap; destination according to WP:COMMONNAME. Klbrain (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposal to merge Emery cloth and Sandpaper to Coated abrasive, given that all of these pages are short and reader would benefit from the broader context. The terms could stay as subheadings where any differences can be explained. I'd extend the proposal to include Emery paper too! Klbrain (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. "Coated abrasive" fails WP:COMMONNAME. Nobody is going to come looking for this term and are going to be confused when they land at that article. Having both emery paper and emery cloth does seem redundant and neither are brilliant articles. Sandpaper is a little better article, as well as being a widely-recognised term, and I'd suggest merging things into that title. Lithopsian (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, since sandpaper is far different to other types of abrasive papers. 202.169.23.60 (talk) 03:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, Wikipedia should be technically correct, not sloppy street argot Timpo (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy with merging all to Sandpaper, as per WP:COMMONNAME and the suggestion of Lithopsian, having some sections to discuss related concepts like Emery cloth. Any objections? Klbrain (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support the merge suggested by Klbrain. !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyous! (talk • contribs) 23:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]