Talk:Coat of arms of Malta

Malta Top‑importance

	Malta portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology

Coat of arms of Malta is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology

Copyvio

I removed the first section, on the Coat of Arm used between 1964 and 1975. It was a copyvio from [1]. Pruneau^talk 23:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dolphins or barracuda?

I was once told that the fish on the 64 to 75 COA where actually Barracuda not dolphins. I forget the heraldic explanation given. --195.158.70.127 16:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term used in heraldry and decorative arts is "dolphin". It is a stylized fish (not a stylized mammal). The picture on the page is pretty close to the usual form. (Although they are often depicted with the tail sticking up.) Perhaps the barracuda reference attempts to identify the actual species of fish upon which the heraldic dolphin is based. I always thought it looked more like a sea robin.Monomoit (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag or Arms -- Which came first?

The article mirrors the Maltese government Web site in stating that the coat of arms depicts the flag. There is some merit to this view, since the wording implies that the Maltese constitution specifies the flag, while the arms are ordained by a regular act of the parliament.

Historically, the influence is the other way round, and the page should probably reflect this. Even before the George Cross was added, the white-and-red arms were the main symbol of the government.

Before 1964, all references showed the conventional badge-on-ensign design for the Maltese flag. The [2] (Flag of Gibraltar) page illustrates what I am talking about. Given that Malta and Gibraltar had similar status before 1964, this page should probably contain something similar for pre-1964. Monomoit (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coat of arms of Malta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150629143728/https://www.gov.mt/en/About%20Malta/Pages/Flags-Symbols-and-their-use.aspx to https://www.gov.mt/en/About%20Malta/Pages/Flags-Symbols-and-their-use.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]