Jump to content

Talk:Coat of arms of England/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay: a bad case of wiki apathy, but I've recovered sufficiently. I've now had a quick read through of the article and it appears to be a strong GAN. I suspect that it would gain GA-status this time round without too much work. Tomorrow I will start my detailed review, but leading the WP:Lead until last.Pyrotec (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  • I'm awarding this article GA-status.
  • Based on its current status as a well-referenced and suitable illustrated article, I beleive that in due course it might be considered suitable for WP:FAC, but I would recommend at least one WP:PR to gain constructive comments from a number of editors.

Congratulations on acheiving GA. Pyrotec (talk) 17:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]