Jump to content

Talk:Clyfford Still

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Still Wishes & Abstract Expessionism

[edit]

Love all the new edits to the page. Couple notes:

The earlier edit noted that his paintings "...have been held in storage in Maryland since his death owing to a stipulation in his will that they may only be shown in a gallery built to his own specifications and under his own terms." The new edit mentions that his works have been out a view, but not that these were the Still's wishes.

Also, much weight has been placed here on Still being an abstract expressionist, but this is category many scholars find insufficient and Still himself did not subscribe to. Should there be reference to this debate?

--Knulclunk (talk) 00:14, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and yes..I'd appreciate your input - please re-add the earlier note about his wishes. I re-added the color field input - but left to Still or Rothko - they'd just say Great Artist no label - if you can add some references and some mention of the debate that is welcome. No artist subscribes easily to labels. Agnes Martin and Don Judd each maintained they weren't Minimalists. Ad Reinhardt the same about Minimalism and Abstract Expressionism. Some argue Gorky was pre-Abstract Expressionism. Basically IMHO Clyfford Still was an Abstract Expressionist on the Color Field side...as different from the Action Painting side....Modernist (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'who developed a new, powerful approach to painting' - abstract expressionism was new; but to say it was or is powerful without supporting evidence or context feels incomplete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.161.31 (talk) 17:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PBS Antiques Roadshow, January 2009

[edit]

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/roadshow/archive/200801A34.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertkeller (talkcontribs) 21:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clyfford Still. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Potential source for Sam Hunter quote

[edit]

Here's a possible source for the Sam Hunter quote.[1] This source appears to be a self-published reprint of an article from a periodical that may not make its content accessible on the web. Does anyone have access to a hard copy of this issue of Arts Perspective Magazine? Msramming (talk) 01:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Goebel, Leanne (4 May 2012). "Clyfford Still: Influential Maverick from Arts Perspective Magazine". Leanne Goebel. Retrieved 22 March 2018.