Talk:Clonazolam

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I was wondering if there’s any Withdrawal symptoms from clonazepam lam

More specifically a triazolobenzodiazepine

Like adinazolam should we not call this a triazolobenzodiazepine (since it also has the triazole ring) ? - Rod57 (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Legality

United States

Page specifies that this drug is listed as Schedule I medication and not FDA approved. This is missing a source, and should not be taken as fact that clonazolam is federally Schedule I. This notice for public comment by the FDA from 02/21 appears to have placed or recommended clonazolam to be placed under Schedule IV of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, but I cannot find confirmation elsewhere.^[1] --DBlasioN (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "International Drug Scheduling; Convention on Psychotropic Substances; Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs; World Health Organization; Scheduling Recommendations; Isotonitazene; MDMB-4en-PINACA; CUMYL-PEGACLONE; Flubromazolam; Clonazolam; Diclazepam; 3-Methoxyphencyclidine; Diphenidine; Request for Comments". Federal Register.

No IUPAC name listed

This issue is just what the title says. It would be nice to have an IUPAC name listed. Most other articles for pharmaceutical drugs, and many nonpharmaceuticals include the IUPAC name. So, the fact that this page is missing one is out of the ordinary

Thank you. VoidHalo (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out I had the page for clonazepam and clonazolam opened and thought this was the clonazepam page, hence my surprise at the lack of an IUPAC name.

Now that I realize this is about clonazolam, I can understand why there might not be an IUPAC name listed where you can provide a citation. I mean, any first year organic chenistry student could probably come up with an IUPAC name. But, I don't know how that would hold up without a citation. One never knows if they made an error.

Despite the mixup, I still think it would be a good idea to have an IUPAC name listed. And additional chemical properties, of course.

Thanks again. VoidHalo (talk) 23:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "International Drug Scheduling; Convention on Psychotropic Substances; Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs; World Health Organization; Scheduling Recommendations; Isotonitazene; MDMB-4en-PINACA; CUMYL-PEGACLONE; Flubromazolam; Clonazolam; Diclazepam; 3-Methoxyphencyclidine; Diphenidine; Request for Comments". Federal Register.

[1]