Talk:Clock Tower (series)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 01:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this submission shortly. I can say right off the bat that I do not see any issues in regards to plagiarism (as I incorrectly declined Clock Tower II: The Struggle Within for before immediately correcting the error after it was brought to my attention). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- The statements made within the article are backed up by reliable sources and citations are included where appropriate/needed. Copyright violations and plagiarism are not a concern.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article broadly covers the topic. It covers the development, history, overall reception, and common elements between the games of the series.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article is written from a neutral point of view.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- The article is stable, it has not had a single revert since 11 September 2016, I have no concerns here.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images within the article do have appropriate fair use rationales and do contain captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall: The article is well written and does not give me cause for concern.
- Pass/Fail:
- Congratulations to TarkusAB and all other editors who have positively contributed to this article!
- Pass/Fail:
- @TheSandDoctor: Thanks for reviewing both this article and Clock Tower II. I understand the mistake from earlier so thanks for owning up to it. I hope you have an opportunity to use the On Hold function in the future to better understand its value at creating a dialogue about the article content. TarkusABtalk 05:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)