Talk:Clipboard manager

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

List page

Why is there no page List of Clipboard managers with a feature table? There are enough clipboard managers out there to warrant it. - 111.193.178.136 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! :-) 213.247.73.83 (talk) 08:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I think the external links are helpful. What's the wikipedia guideline on this? peterl 04:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:External links. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 04:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thanks for clarification peterl 04:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that they are helpful, because that's how I discovered the app that I am currently running. — ¾-10 20:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few other popular clipboard managers:

M8 Free Clipboard 500 Clips —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.50.140.155 (talk) 23:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All these should be on the List of clipboard managers: [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.247.73.83 (talk) 08:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added them. ~Kvng (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These additions are clearly against WP:EL, and add non-notable listcruft. Please provide atleast some kind of independent reliable sources to show that these products are noteworthy. GermanJoe (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GermanJoe: I assume you're objecting to the external links directly in the table. As far as what entries should be allowed in the table, that's WP:LSC and doesn't necessarily require WP:GNG-style demonstration of notability. ~Kvng (talk) 20:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kvng: Yes, regarding the external links. Regarding inclusion: common selection criteria are listed at WP:CSC (although the list is probably meant to be non-exclusive). Entries should have atleast some evidence of wider relevance - a self-published generic website is not sufficient to judge an entry's relevance (otherwise I could just code my own personal clipboard manager, create a small website, and promote it via Wikipedia). The list guideline notes: "Criteria for inclusion should factor in encyclopedic and topical relevance, not just verifiable existence." (I have the page watchlisted btw, but thank you for the ping). GermanJoe (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]